Researchers from Australia and the UK are finding ways to improve treatments for injuries to the hand, detailing their results in the recently published ‘Patient-specific 3D-printed Splint for Mallet Finger Injury.’ The goal is to offer better outcomes for patients who may have experienced damage to the tendon responsible for straightening the joint found at the end of the finger (or thumb).
Mallet finger injuries most commonly occur due to trauma after being struck by an object that bends the finger or thumb tip painfully.
While there are many injuries and illnesses far more seriously affecting lives today, losing the use of a finger or hand can be debilitating as we must use them for so many tasks—primarily at work. Many types of splints may be uncomfortable for the patient to wear, but are also labor-intensive and expensive to make, resulting in the use of excess material during production too.
3D printing and additive manufacturing processes are beginning to make an impact in manufacturing of orthotics, offering benefits like greater affordability, speed in production, and best of all—total customization. Innovation around the globe has resulted in new software and improved workflow for creating medical devices like orthotics, the production of more comfortable foot/ankle orthotics, myoletric orthotics, and more.
“Mallet finger is often left untreated by patients unless severe restriction in extensor ability is present, or there is lingering pain. This injury, in the case, that there are functional shortfalls, can impede the whole hand in everyday fine motor skill tasks,” explained the authors. “Furthermore, this deformity can develop additional medical conditions in the finger and hand as overcompensation can create hyperextension of proximal interphalangeal joint, a swan neck deformity.
“Effective use of AM may lead to a reduction in size and weight of the splint making it more comfortable for the user.”
Today, the most common splints are the prefabricated stack splint, the dorsal aluminum splint, and the customized thermoplastic splint. Generally they are worn for six to eight weeks, but with the first two choices there may be ongoing comfort issues as the splints may not fit well, causing the skin to become irritated. The patient may experience added pain, and the splint itself may break due to inferior materials or manufacturing. Many patients are also unhappy with the size and style of their splints.
“… customized splints, fitted to the exact dimensions of a patient’s finger, have the ability to provide successful treatment in more cases than the other two splint types,” stated the authors.
FDM 3D printing was chosen for the course of this study as the researchers made samples, noting that they would be taking advantage of the ability to fabricate complex geometries not previously possible through conventional techniques in manufacturing. More importantly is the ability to offer patient-specific treatment like never before—especially with medical devices like prosthetics and orthotics. In this study, the issue of comfort could be addressed with comprehensive customization, splints made quickly, and revised simply by changing the 3D design and printing a new one in the case of growth (these issues are common with children who may outgrow an orthotic made with conventional methods before it even arrives to them!), damage, or other requirements.
The research team used Autodesk Inventor for entering the measurements for their sample, including a built-in constraint:
“When the user clenches their fist, without this material removed, the skin of their middle phalanx finger can push into the back of the splint dislodging its correct position. The stack splint is designed with an open ventilation section above the fingernail to allow some airflow to reduce sweat when being worn and to allow limited access for washing.”
Addressing the issue of wasted material and recycling of products later, the researchers point out that patient-specific devices like the splints they designed cannot be re-used by another individual later due to the level of customization, so they must be disposed of; however, with the use of PLA as their 3D printing material, a discarded splint can be ‘composted’ within six to eight weeks.
One of the main objectives in the study was to develop a highly functional orthotic with topology optimization, eliminating as much material as possible while still maintaining the splint’s required volume fraction and stiffness.
“In FDM topology optimized and original design, finger splints were fabricated, original (100% mass), 62.51% mass, 71.13% mass, and 79.49% mass, by the same 3D printer and processing parameters used for the dog-bone specimens,” stated the researchers.
Noting that deflection results did not correlate exactly with heat dissipation, a trade-off analysis was required in choosing the best splint since the initial splint operating at 100 percent mass offered the best mechanical performance, but the 71.13 percent mass splint performed optimally in heat dissipation.
“This splint is simpler to print than lower percentage mass splints that can require more printing support structures. It was found that inevitably reducing the amount of material in a load-bearing finger splint would increase the deflection of it. However, when the distribution of that material is chosen to optimize the stiffness in that situation, the deflection value was low enough to justify its use,” concluded the researchers.
“The results of this project would pave the way for the medical industry to utilize superior advanced manufacturing and minimum materials that have been shape optimized to better serve their purpose while improving patient comfort.”
What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.
[Source / Images: ‘Patient-specific 3D-printed Splint for Mallet Finger Injury’]